🔗 Share this article

Recently, the game developers launched a new playlist called Casual Breakthrough. In essence, this option resembles the standard Breakthrough setup but includes several key changes:

• Every squad has only eight real players, with the rest made up of 32 bots.
• Actions performed by real players award complete experience points, while bot actions offer lower rewards.
• Only two maps can be played: Cairo Siege and Empire State map.
• Elements like Player tags, achievements, and career stat updates are disabled.

In short, the playlist delivers on its name: it offers a laid-back version of Breakthrough. At face value, you might think it's a good idea, since it provides more options for gamers seeking alternative ways to enjoy the title. However, if video games has shown one thing, it's that not everyone will be happy. Which is to say, many Battlefield 6 fans are upset.

Community Responses: From Fury to Support

"Gamers prefer human opponents. Don't repeat the mistakes of your competitors," reads a response to the mode reveal. "Absolutely shocking idea," says another. At the same time, on the Battlefield subreddit, one user remarks, "It's unclear where we are headed with this title," while another lists all the issues they consider to be problematic in the game: "Fix bugs, fix drone glitch, fix IVF rockets, fix [the] bloom after sprinting bug, improve hit detection. We do not require this AI-heavy playlist."

On the other hand, amid the criticism, some gamers explaining how much they're liking the recent addition. "It's very fun to practice, human participants keep it from being a total farmfest but it's very relaxed," reads one Reddit comment. "This subreddit doesn't understand that there are gamers who have lives and don't play this title 24/7. Allow them to find a middle ground," adds a different comment. One reply via social media clarifies that as they're "a battledad with busy schedules, this is perfect for me," while someone else applauds the mode for "avoiding intense competition."

Constructive Criticisms and Community Feedback

Despite the support, players have constructive reasons to criticize the new mode. Some users have pointed out that it will make wait times even longer for different playlists due to the sheer number of playlists currently available. On a similar note, some areas often face mostly bots in the current modes. It also seems a little backwards that the mode does not begin without a minimum number of human gamers, even though it focuses mostly on combat against bots.

Lastly, one of the biggest grievances is that Battlefield Portal was meant to offer full XP, including AI matches, but that was removed when they tried to remove XP farming from the system. So Casual Breakthrough seems like the player base meeting them halfway, as per forum feedback. A different user describes this addition as the developers "dropping the ball so hard, I had great enjoyment in the initial release, what prompted them to adjust it?"

Future Prospects: Will Changes Occur?

Should the development team has proven anything to date with the latest installment, it is that they're listening and responding to player input. Tasks that were overly hard were adjusted very quickly, as did the required Redsec challenges. It is likely that, if their data shows this recent mode is underperforming to their expectations, they won't be shy to make further modifications.