🔗 Share this article

Itbecame clear he endured losing against lower-league opposition. He weathered an important European final versus one of the worst Tottenham teams for many years. He withstood losing at home to domestic rivals, a lowly league position, the tactical inflexibility, squandering some of the club’s best academy products, a poor winning percentage, labeling his team the poorest in Manchester United history. Yet, there existed one adversary against whom Ruben Amorim was not permitted to dance. If you challenge the sporting director, and you best not miss.

Regrettably, like many a Premiership right-back during Blackburn Rovers' title-winning campaign, the coach took on the executive and appears to have failed. Even the most distracted of readers will notice the irony here: a manager who often railed at his players for losing one-on-one duels succumbing in the face of the intense pressure and animal charisma of one of England's top division's most feared sporting directors.

And frankly, this whole painful saga seems to paint the director in a different perspective. Perhaps it might have been tempting, based on his brief stint of experience at Southampton, to view him as merely a functionary within the club's structure: an individual whose appointment was due as much to his friendship with ex-colleague a fellow executive as any demonstrable skill. How mistaken we all were. In brilliantly outsmarting the club's celebrated manager, just as he bested the hapless a previous executive before him, he has demonstrated to be among football's strategic masterminds: a strategic mind of which the club's competitors are now justifiably concerned.

The Strategic Clash Over Formation and Ideology

For example, this was Jason Wilcox who having been part of the leadership that hired the rigid 3-4-3 advocate Amorim in the first place, was instrumental in trying to persuade him to ditch his favored formation. Unsurprisingly, these entreaties faced pushback. But perhaps these judgements hold greater authority when issued from the mouth with the impeccable football pedigree he possesses, holder of international appearances and a role in a championship team from 31 years ago.

Maybe eventually he may be persuaded to outline his reasoning to the rest of us. Maybe one day he might be asked why Amorim is departing with a full payout, without any compensation reduction clause in place. But Jason Wilcox speaks rarely in public, and with very good reason. The real thinkers in football – men like him – function at a level beyond our own prosaic understanding. If he ever did speak, most likely all we would hear would be ultrasonic blips and complex calculations. Wanting is not quite the same as being ready to receive.

The Supreme Power In Command

But of course, by focusing our attention on Jason Wilcox we overlook the true genius behind the club's current leadership. The director is, after all, simply carrying out the directives of his ultimate line manager the billionaire owner, who privately has emphasized his desire for a back four. It is reported, the owner has also suggested playing Bryan Mbeumo in a wing-back role. Ratcliffe is keen for United to adopt data science and metrics. According to ESPN, during a leadership summit early in his investment, he announced that United’s style to football “will be determined in this room”.

Ultimately, Sir Jim is an expert in this technical footballing stuff, leveraging his previous experience in petrochemicals and yachting. Above all he is incredibly rich, and it is known, the rich are the best of us: more insightful, more wise, strategically brilliant, simply better. Who else could one trust to oversee a strategic plan of austerity, the building of a modern arena that appears similar to someone’s leftover knitting, the acquisition of a new striker?

A New Soccer Hierarchy: Executives Above Managers

This is a trend that is becoming prevalent at the elite levels football. For decades, clubs foolishly delegated major sporting choices to subordinate staff such as coaches, talent spotters – players themselves. Maybe previously feasible for a young, innovative manager with a philosophy and drive to go into an organization and see their vision supported to fruition. Yet how many businesses have such individuals set up? How many large-scale layoffs have they overseen? Far preferable to invest genuine authority where it belongs: the executive class, the casually dressed executives, the guys with the jaw-dropping LinkedIn profiles. Better by far to decide the tactics in the boardroom and appoint a coach who can tailor their offering to suit. If managers were formerly chefs, they have become more akin to Deliveroo drivers: not really responsible for the food, yet ultimately answerable should it be delivered poorly or fails to meet standards.

In the meantime, their job is increasingly not about crafting the philosophy and more about selling it: the receptionist of the operation, the public face of an organisation they can do little to influence. A coach at Chelsea leads a team of very young players into Europe and wins domestic cups, and essentially is dismissed for speaking out. Wilfried Nancy finds his standing damaged whereas those individuals who hired him live to blunder indefinitely.

A Neoliberal Game: Accountability Only for the Few

And perhaps on some microcosmic level this represents neoliberalism at work: the rise of a privileged overclass who can never be wrong, whose choices remain sacrosanct, whose mistakes can invariably be resolved by sacking without justification. Appoint the 3-4-3 coach only to dismiss him for playing excessively that system. Bring in the process guy and later bin them for taking excessive time. And most importantly be grateful; for your modest season ticket price rises, for the latest summer signings, for the reality that the grownups – regardless of their expertise – are in charge.